ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Exploring the Relationship Between Electronic Device Use and Psychological Dimensions of Procrastination in University Students.
Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study examines the relationship between electronic device use and psychological dimensions of procrastination in university students. The main objectives were to identify screen usage habits, explore their association with key psychological factors, and determine whether these factors predict perceived procrastination. An ad hoc instrument and descriptive, correlational, and regression techniques were used for data analysis of a sample of 924 Spanish university students. From this sample, a target subsample of 386 students who reported high levels of procrastination was selected to analyse screen-use patterns and their links with procrastination dimensions. In contrast, the full sample was used to estimate the predictive regression models. Results showed high screen use among students, with 20% potentially at risk for problematic use. High screen use correlated with lower self-regulation, self-efficacy, and self-esteem, and higher anxiety. Conversely, higher self-regulation and self-efficacy were linked to more motivation, better self-esteem, and less anxiety. Regression results indicated that screen time, self-regulation, and self-efficacy significantly predict procrastination levels. These findings suggest that psychological factors play a key role in how screen use relates to procrastination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.