Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41594932›Full record

ReviewBiology2026

Neurobiological Convergence in SPDs and ADHD: Insights from a Narrative Review.

Daniele Corbo, Laura Clara Grandi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Daniele CorboDepartment of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences and Public Health, University of Brescia, 25123 Brescia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5078-6636
Laura Clara GrandiDepartment of Biotechnology and Biosciences, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20126 Milano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8174-5394

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The sensory system plays a critical role in development, as it enables the processing and integration of internal and external stimuli. Dysfunctions in this system lead to sensory processing disorders (SPDs), which affect approximately 5-13% of children aged 4-6 years, impacting not only sensory responsiveness but also social interaction, emotional regulation, motor coordination, learning, attention, communication, and sleep. Although SPDs have been extensively investigated from molecular to behavioral levels, their underlying neurobiological mechanisms remain debated, and reliable biomarkers are still lacking. Moreover, due to overlapping behavioral manifestations, SPDs are frequently misdiagnosed as attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), leading to challenges in accurate diagnosis and treatment planning. This narrative review aims to synthesize current evidence on the neurofunctional and molecular underpinnings of SPDs in relation to ADHD, providing an integrated perspective on their converging and diverging pathways. By comparing neuroimaging and neurophysiological findings across the two conditions, we seek to deepen understanding of their shared mechanisms, clarify diagnostic boundaries, and inform the development of targeted, evidence-based interventions to address a critical gap in the field.

Indexed as

attention deficit hyperactivity disorderneuroimagingsensory dysfunctionssensory processing disorderssensory system

Identifiers

PMID41594932
PMCPMC12837382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.