ReviewBiology2026
Advances in Audio Classification and Artificial Intelligence for Respiratory Health and Welfare Monitoring in Swine.
Review in Biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Synergies and Trade-Offs in Modern Poultry Nutrition: An Integrated Framework Linking Animal Health, Productivity and Greenhouse Gas Mitigation.Veterinary sciences · 2026Review
- Exploratory Room-Level Acoustic Soundscape Monitoring of Cough-like Events Under Standard and Ventilation-Restricted Pig-Housing Conditions Using Audio Spectrogram Transformer.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Respiratory diseases remain one of the most significant health challenges in modern swine production, leading to substantial economic losses, compromised animal welfare, and increased antimicrobial use. In recent years, advances in artificial intelligence (AI), particularly machine learning and deep learning, have enabled the development of non-invasive, continuous monitoring systems based on pig vocalizations. Among these, audio-based technologies have emerged as especially promising tools for early detection and monitoring of respiratory disorders under real farm conditions. This review provides a comprehensive synthesis of AI-driven audio classification approaches applied to pig farming, with focus on respiratory health and welfare monitoring. First, the biological and acoustic foundations of pig vocalizations and their relevance to health and welfare assessment are outlined. The review then systematically examines sound acquisition technologies, feature engineering strategies, machine learning and deep learning models, and evaluation methodologies reported in the literature. Commercially available systems and recent advances in real-time, edge, and on-farm deployment are also discussed. Finally, key challenges related to data scarcity, generalization, environmental noise, and practical deployment are identified, and emerging opportunities for future research including multimodal sensing, standardized datasets, and explainable AI are highlighted. This review aims to provide researchers, engineers, and industry stakeholders with a consolidated reference to guide the development and adoption of robust AI-based acoustic monitoring systems for respiratory health management in swine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.