Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41594857›Full record

ReviewBiology2026

Delayed Signaling in Mitotic Checkpoints: Biological Mechanisms and Modeling Perspectives.

Bashar Ibrahim

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Bashar IbrahimCentre for Applied Mathematics & Bioinformatics, Department of Mathematics & Natural Sciences, Gulf University for Science and Technology, Hawally 32093, Kuwait.ORCID 0000-0001-7773-0122

Funding

SEED GUST 128
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Time delays are intrinsic to mitotic regulation, particularly within the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) and the spindle position checkpoint (SPOC). These delays emerge from multi-step protein activation, molecular transport, force-dependent conformational transitions, and spatial redistribution of regulatory complexes. They span seconds to minutes and strongly influence checkpoint activation, maintenance, and silencing. Increasing evidence shows that such delayed processes shape mitotic timing, checkpoint robustness, and cell-fate decisions. While classical ordinary differential equation (ODE) models assume instantaneous biochemical responses, delay differential equations (DDEs) provide a natural framework for representing these finite timescales by explicitly incorporating system history. Recent DDE-based studies have revealed how delayed signaling contributes to bistability, oscillatory responses, prolonged mitotic arrest, and variability in checkpoint outputs. This review summarizes the biological origins of delays in SAC and SPOC, including Mad2 activation, MCC assembly and turnover, APC/C reactivation, tension maturation at kinetochores, and Bfa1-Bub2 regulation of Tem1. The article further discusses how mechanistic models with explicit delays improve our understanding of SAC-SPOC ordering, error-correction dynamics, and mitotic exit control. Finally, open challenges and future directions are outlined for integrative delay-aware modeling that unifies biochemical, mechanical, and spatial processes to better explain checkpoint function and chromosomal stability.

Indexed as

delay differential equationsmitotic checkpointsspindle assembly checkpointspindle position checkpointtime delays

Identifiers

PMID41594857
PMCPMC12837216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.