ReviewBrain sciences2026
Beyond Transplantation: Engineering Neural Cell Therapies and Combination Strategies for Spinal Cord Repair.
Review in Brain sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Microtubules in Spinal Cord Injury: From Cytoskeletal Dysregulation to Therapeutic Regeneration.Journal of neurochemistry · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Spinal cord injury (SCI) remains one of the most formidable challenges in regenerative medicine, often resulting in permanent loss of motor, sensory, and autonomic function. Cell-based therapies offer a promising path toward repair by providing donor neurons and glia capable of integrating into host circuits, modulating the injury environment, and restoring function. Early studies employing fetal neural tissue and neural progenitor cells (NPCs) have demonstrated proof-of-principle for survival, differentiation, and synaptic integration. More recently, pluripotent stem cell (PSC)-derived donor populations and engineered constructs have expanded the therapeutic repertoire, enabling precise specification of interneuron subtypes, astrocytes, and oligodendrocytes tailored to the injured spinal cord. Advances in genetic engineering, including CRISPR-based editing, trophic factor overexpression, and immune-evasive modifications, are giving rise to next-generation donor cells with enhanced survival and controllable integration. At the same time, biomaterials, pharmacological agents, activity-based therapies, and neuromodulation strategies are being combined with transplantation to overcome barriers and promote long-term recovery. In this review, we summarize progress in designing and engineering donor cells and tissues for SCI repair, highlight how combination strategies are reshaping the therapeutic landscape, and outline opportunities for next-generation approaches. Together, these advances point toward a future in which tailored, multimodal cell-based therapies achieve consistent and durable restoration of spinal cord function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.