ArticleBrain sciences2026
Global and Local Processing of Letters and Faces in Children and Adolescents with Typical and Atypical Development.
Article in Brain sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesthis paper investigates the local vs. global visual processing preference in typically developing (TD) children, youth with Down syndrome (DS), and youth with Williams syndrome (WS). In particular, the global precedence effect (GPE) and the global interference effect (GI) have recently been described as two distinct and at least partially independent effects.
methodsin this study, 50 participants (TD = 25, DS = 13, WS = 12) completed two experiments requiring the identification of either the global or local level of hierarchical stimuli, which consisted of letters and schematic faces. For each stimulus type, two separate blocks were conducted, one with the task to focus on the local elements and the other with the task to focus on the global shape.
resultsour results indicate that TD children demonstrate a global precedence effect for letters but not for schematic faces, suggesting a developmental modulation of configural processing. In contrast, both DS and WS groups showed a global processing bias for schematic faces and a significant global interference effect in both conditions, likely reflecting deficits in inhibitory control.
conclusionsthese findings challenge the notion that DS and WS individuals can be classified strictly as global or local processors, respectively, emphasizing the influence of stimulus type and cognitive demands. Implications for neurodevelopmental research and clinical interventions are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.