Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41594734›Full record

ArticleBrain sciences2025

Wayfinding with Impaired Vision: Preferences for Cues, Strategies, and Aids (Part I-Perspectives from Visually Impaired Individuals).

Dominique P H Blokland, Maartje J E van Loef, Nathan van der Stoep, Albert Postma, Krista E Overvliet

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Dominique P H BloklandExperimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7954-5761
Maartje J E van LoefExperimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Nathan van der StoepHuman Machine Teaming, Defense, Safety, and Security, Nederlandse Organisatie voor Toegepast-Natuurwetenschappelijk Onderzoek (TNO), 3769 DE Soesterberg, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0412-2078
Albert PostmaExperimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Krista E OvervlietExperimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3537-8172

Funding

ZonMw 60-63700-98-520
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

People with visual impairments (VIPs) can participate in orientation and mobility (O&M) training to learn how to navigate to their desired goal locations. During O&M training, personal wayfinding preferences with regard to cue use and wayfinding strategy choice are taken into account. However, there is still a lack of clarity about which factors shape VIPs' wayfinding experiences and how. BACKGROUND/

objectivesIn this study, we mapped individual differences in preferred sensory modality (both orientation- and mobility-related), and classified which personal and environmental factors are relevant for these preferences.

methodsTo this end, interviews were conducted with eleven Dutch VIPs whose impairment varied in onset, ontology, and severity.

resultsWe concluded from our thematic analysis that hearing is the most important sensory modality to VIPs for orientation purposes, although it varies per person how and how often other resources are relied upon (i.e., other sensory modalities, existing knowledge of an environment, help from others, or navigational aids). Additionally, environmental factors such as weather conditions, crowdedness, and familiarity of the environment influence if, how, and which sensory modalities are employed. These preferences and strategies might be mediated by individual differences in priorities and needs pertaining to energy management.

conclusionsWe discuss how the current findings could be of interest to orientation and mobility instructors when choosing a training strategy for individual clients.

Indexed as

blindnesslow visionmobilitynavigationorientationsensory preferencesthematic analysisvisual impairmentwayfinding strategies

Identifiers

PMID41594734
PMCPMC12838941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.