ReviewBiomolecules2025
Optimizing Extracellular Vesicles for Cardiac Repair Post-Myocardial Infarction: Approaches and Challenges.
Review in Biomolecules, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Engineered extracellular vesicles for ischemic heart diseases: modification methods, targeted delivery strategies, and multi-modal therapies - A systematic review.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Small Extracellular Vesicles in Cardioprotection, Cardiac Repair, and Regeneration: Cargo Mechanisms, Producer Cell Sources, and Translational Development.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Review
- From pathophysiology to therapy: molecular mechanisms of stem cell and extracellular vesicle-mediated repair in diabetic peripheral neuropathy.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ischemic heart disease remains the leading cause of cardiovascular mortality worldwide. In myocardial infarction (MI), extracellular vesicles (EVs)-particularly small EVs (sEVs)-transport therapeutic cargo such as miR-21-5p, which suppresses apoptosis, and other proteins, lipids, and RNAs that can modulate cell death, inflammation, angiogenesis, and remodeling. This review synthesizes recent mechanistic and preclinical evidence on native and engineered EVs for post-MI repair, mapping therapeutic entry points across the MI timeline (acute injury, inflammation, and healing) and comparing EV sources (stem-cell and non-stem-cell), administration routes, and dosing strategies. We highlight engineering approaches-including surface ligands for cardiac homing, rational cargo loading to enhance potency, and biomaterial depots to prolong myocardial residence-that aim to improve tropism, durability, and efficacy. Manufacturing and analytical considerations are discussed in the context of contemporary guidance, with emphasis on identity, purity, and potency assays, as well as safety, immunogenicity, and pharmacology relevant to cardiac populations. Across small- and large-animal models, EV-based interventions have been associated with reduced infarct/scar burden, enhanced vascularization, and improved ventricular function, with representative preclinical studies reporting approximately 25-45% relative reductions in infarct size in rodent and porcine MI models, despite substantial heterogeneity in EV sources, formulations, and outcome reporting that limits cross-study comparability. We conclude that achieving clinical translation will require standardized cardiac-targeting strategies, validated good manufacturing practice (GMP)-compatible manufacturing platforms, and harmonized potency assays, alongside rigorous, head-to-head preclinical designs, to advance EV-based cardiorepair toward clinical testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.