Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41594510›Full record

ReviewAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2026

Haptic Signals as a Communication Tool Between Handlers and Dogs: Review of a New Field.

Hillary Jean-Joseph, Dalila Bovet

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hillary Jean-JosephLaboratoire Ethologie Cognition Développement (LECD), Université Paris Nanterre, 92000 Nanterre, France.ORCID 0009-0002-1944-3816
Dalila BovetLaboratoire Ethologie Cognition Développement (LECD), Université Paris Nanterre, 92000 Nanterre, France.ORCID 0000-0002-2934-3387

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-22-CE39-0017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Developing new haptic communication tools to enhance communication between dogs and their handlers during field operations has garnered interest in recent years. It is a promising field that could ameliorate dog-handler interactions in the field while addressing practical challenges, such as the need for discrete communication during operations. When extended to the public, such technology could improve communication with impaired dogs. With this review, we aim to (1) give an overview of dogs' understanding and discrimination of haptic signals, (2) highlight the need to investigate the possible impact of such tools on dogs' welfare, as well as (3) point out current caveats and future research directions.

Indexed as

animal–computer interactionhapticharnesshuman–doginteractionremote communicationvestvibrotactile

Identifiers

PMID41594510
PMCPMC12837276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.