Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41594478›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2026

Environmental Variables in the Mexican Tropics and Their Relationship to Management and Welfare in Crossbreed Zebu Cattle.

Miguel A Damián Valdez, Virginio Aguirre, Saul Rojas Hernández, Jaime Olivares Pérez, Mariana Pedernera, Abel Villa-Mancera, Lucero Sarabia Salgado, Agustín Olmedo-Juárez, Fredy Quiroz Cardoso, Moises Cipriano Salazar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Miguel A Damián ValdezFacultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia N°1, Universidad Autónoma de Guerrero, Carretera Nacional Cd. Altamirano-Iguala Km.3 Colonia Querenditas, Cd, Altamirano 40610, Guerrero, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-5098-7283
Virginio AguirreFacultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos, Avenida Universidad 1001 Colonia Chamilpa, Morelos 62210, Cuernavaca, Mexico.
Saul Rojas HernándezFacultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia N°1, Universidad Autónoma de Guerrero, Carretera Nacional Cd. Altamirano-Iguala Km.3 Colonia Querenditas, Cd, Altamirano 40610, Guerrero, Mexico.
Jaime Olivares PérezFacultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia N°1, Universidad Autónoma de Guerrero, Carretera Nacional Cd. Altamirano-Iguala Km.3 Colonia Querenditas, Cd, Altamirano 40610, Guerrero, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-7455-2890
Mariana PederneraFacultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos, Avenida Universidad 1001 Colonia Chamilpa, Morelos 62210, Cuernavaca, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0001-6912-056X
Abel Villa-ManceraFacultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, Tecamachalco 75482, Puebla, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-5997-5641
Lucero Sarabia SalgadoFacultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia N°1, Universidad Autónoma de Guerrero, Carretera Nacional Cd. Altamirano-Iguala Km.3 Colonia Querenditas, Cd, Altamirano 40610, Guerrero, Mexico.
Agustín Olmedo-JuárezInstituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestal, Agrícolas y Pecuarias-CENID-SAI, Cuernavaca 62550, Morelos, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0001-5499-7449
Fredy Quiroz CardosoFacultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia N°1, Universidad Autónoma de Guerrero, Carretera Nacional Cd. Altamirano-Iguala Km.3 Colonia Querenditas, Cd, Altamirano 40610, Guerrero, Mexico.
Moises Cipriano SalazarFacultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia N°1, Universidad Autónoma de Guerrero, Carretera Nacional Cd. Altamirano-Iguala Km.3 Colonia Querenditas, Cd, Altamirano 40610, Guerrero, Mexico.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most animal welfare (AW) assessment protocols have been developed for intensive production systems and European cattle, raising concerns about their applicability in the tropics. To compare the results obtained by using the welfare quality (WQ) assessment for fattening cattle in the dry tropics, relevant modifications were implemented in 20 cattle production units (PUs) during the dry (DS) and rainy (RS) seasons. Regarding the principle of good feeding, only during the RS, between 20% and 25% of the farms maintained their animals in the acceptable and good categories, compared to the DS, where all PUs were classified as unacceptable (

Indexed as

animal welfarebovine behaviorcattle flytemperature and humidity index

Identifiers

PMID41594478
PMCPMC12837610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.