Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41594418›Full record

ReviewAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2026

Challenges and Methodologies to Assess Protein Requirement and Quality Across Different Life Stages in Dogs: A Review.

Lucas Bassi Scarpim, Leticia Graziele Pacheco

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lucas Bassi ScarpimSchool of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Jaboticabal 14884-900, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-0503-2805
Leticia Graziele PachecoSchool of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Jaboticabal 14884-900, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7803-6746

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Determining protein requirements (PRs) for dogs remains a longstanding challenge. During growth, the rapid rate of protein deposition increases the demand for amino acids. In adult dogs, differences in overall diet digestibility and lower energy requirements of domestic dogs have led to discrepancies between the minimum crude protein (CP) value proposed by the National Research Council (NRC; 80 g of CP/kg of diet) and the 180 g of CP/kg of diet proposed by the European Pet Food Industry Federation (FEDIAF) and the Association of American Feed Control Officials (AAFCO), although most commercially available adult dog feeds offer protein levels that exceed both recommendations. In elderly dogs, physiological changes such as sarcopenia and reduced energy intake indicate a potential increase in PR, although evidence remains scarce. A similar gap exists for pregnant and lactating bitches, since most recommendations rely on extrapolations from growth studies. Classical PR recommendations were based on body weight gain and nitrogen balance (NB), methods that present important limitations. Due to this, stable isotope methods-including

Indexed as

minimum protein requirementnitrogen balanceprotein qualityrecommended allowancestable isotopes

Identifiers

PMID41594418
PMCPMC12837855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.