ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2026
Machine Learning and SHapley Additive exPlanation-Based Interpretation for Predicting Mastitis in Dairy Cows.
Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Assessment of reproductive performance in dairy cows using explainable machine learning.Archives animal breeding · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis has been applied in disease diagnosis and treatment effect evaluation. However, its application in the prediction and diagnosis of dairy cow diseases remains limited. We investigated whether the variance and autocorrelation of deviations in daily activity, rumination time, and milk electrical conductivity, along with daily milk yield, could be used to predict clinical mastitis in dairy cows using popular machine learning (ML) algorithms and identifying key predictive features using SHAP analysis. Quantile regression (QR) with second- or third-order polynomial models with the median or upper quantiles was used to process raw data from mastitic and healthy cows. Nine variables from the 14-day period preceding mastitis onset were identified as significantly associated with mastitis through logistic regression. These variables were used to train and validate prediction models using eleven classical ML algorithms. Among them, the partial least squares model demonstrated superior performance, achieving an AUC of 0.789, sensitivity of 0.500, specificity of 0.947, accuracy of 0.793, precision of 0.833, and F1-score of 0.625. SHAP analysis results revealed positive contributions of three features to mastitis prediction, whereas two features had negative contributions. These findings provide a theoretical basis for developing clinical decision-support tools in commercial farming settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.