Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41594328›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2026

AI-Enhanced POCUS in Emergency Care.

Monica Puticiu, Diana Cimpoesu, Florica Pop, Irina Ciumanghel, Luciana Teodora Rotaru, Bogdan Oprita, Mihai Alexandru Butoi, Vlad Ionut Belghiru, Raluca Mihaela Tat, Adela Golea

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Monica PuticiuFaculty of Medicine, Vasile Goldis Western University of Arad, 310025 Arad, Romania.ORCID 0009-0005-2965-175X
Diana CimpoesuFaculty of Medicine, "Grigore T. Popa" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-0609-3773
Florica PopFaculty of Medicine, Vasile Goldis Western University of Arad, 310025 Arad, Romania.
Irina CiumanghelFaculty of Medicine, "Grigore T. Popa" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-5207-8529
Luciana Teodora RotaruEmergency Medicine and First Aid Department, Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 200349 Craiova, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-3135-5456
Bogdan OpritaFaculty of Medicine, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania.
Mihai Alexandru ButoiEmergency Medicine and First Aid Department, Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 200349 Craiova, Romania.
Vlad Ionut BelghiruEmergency Medicine and First Aid Department, Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 200349 Craiova, Romania.ORCID 0009-0004-6994-1914
Raluca Mihaela TatDepartment 6 Surgery, Emergency Medicine Discipline, "Iuliu-Hațieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-8829-6384
Adela GoleaDepartment 6 Surgery, Emergency Medicine Discipline, "Iuliu-Hațieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-7227-2326

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is an essential component of emergency medicine, enabling rapid bedside assessment across a wide spectrum of acute conditions. Its effectiveness, however, remains constrained by operator dependency, variable image quality, and time-critical decision-making. Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) offer opportunities to augment POCUS by supporting image acquisition, interpretation, and quantitative analysis. This narrative review synthesizes current evidence on AI-enhanced POCUS applications in emergency care, encompassing trauma, non-traumatic emergencies, integrated workflows, resource-limited settings, and education and training. Across trauma settings, AI-assisted POCUS has demonstrated promising performance for automated detection of pneumothorax, hemothorax, and free intraperitoneal fluid, supporting standardized eFAST examinations and rapid triage. In non-traumatic emergencies, AI-enabled cardiovascular, pulmonary, and abdominal applications provide automated measurements and pattern recognition that can approach expert-level performance when image quality is adequate. Integrated AI-POCUS systems and educational tools further highlight the potential to expand ultrasound access, support non-expert users, and standardize training. Nevertheless, important limitations persist, including limited generalizability, dataset bias, device heterogeneity, and uncertain impact on clinical decision-making and patient outcomes. In conclusion, AI-enhanced POCUS is transitioning from proof-of-concept toward early clinical integration in emergency medicine. While current evidence supports its role as a decision-support tool that may enhance consistency and efficiency, widespread adoption will require prospective multicentre validation, development of representative POCUS-specific datasets, vendor-agnostic solutions, and alignment with clinical, ethical, and regulatory frameworks.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencedeep learningdiagnostic imagingemergency medicinemachine learningPOCUSpoint-of-care ultrasound

Identifiers

PMID41594328
PMCPMC12839756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.