Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41594285›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Improved Microbiological Diagnosis of Bone and Joint Infections Using Mechanical Bead-Milling Extraction of Bone Specimens with the Ultra-Turrax

Maxime Brunaud, Adeline Boutet-Dubois, Alix Pantel, Florian Salipante, Rémy Coulomb, Albert Sotto, Jean-Philippe Lavigne, Nicolas Cellier

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02598141 (Comparative Evaluation of Two Techniques for the Treatment of Per-operative Bacteriological Samples Associated With Osteo-articular Sepsis), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02598141 nacompletednot on this map

Comparative Evaluation of Two Techniques for the Treatment of Per-operative Bacteriological Samples Associated With Osteo-articular Sepsis: Grinding (Ultra Turrax) Versus Standard Methods

TypeinterventionalSponsorCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de NīmesRan2016 to 2018Enrolled122ConditionsBacterial InfectionArmsBiological sampling grinding, Biological sampling with standard procedures
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Maxime BrunaudService d'Orthopédie, University of Montpellier, CHU Nîmes, 30900 Nîmes, France.
Adeline Boutet-DuboisService de Microbiologie et Hygiène Hospitalière, VBIC, INSERM U1047, University of Montpellier, CHU Nîmes, 30900 Nîmes, France.
Alix PantelService de Microbiologie et Hygiène Hospitalière, VBIC, INSERM U1047, University of Montpellier, CHU Nîmes, 30900 Nîmes, France.ORCID 0000-0002-2317-4199
Florian SalipanteService BESPIM, University of Montpellier, CHU Nîmes, 30900 Nîmes, France.ORCID 0000-0002-5367-5058
Rémy CoulombService d'Orthopédie, University of Montpellier, CHU Nîmes, 30900 Nîmes, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7967-9356
Albert SottoSerive de Maladies Infectieuses et Tropicales, VBIC, INSERM U1047, University of Montpellier, CHU Nîmes, 30900 Nîmes, France.ORCID 0000-0002-6463-9386
Jean-Philippe LavigneService de Microbiologie et Hygiène Hospitalière, VBIC, INSERM U1047, University of Montpellier, CHU Nîmes, 30900 Nîmes, France.ORCID 0000-0002-9484-0304
Nicolas CellierService d'Orthopédie, University of Montpellier, CHU Nîmes, 30900 Nîmes, France.

Funding

CHU Nimes LOCAL/2014/NCOM-001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

bead-milling homogenizationbone and joint infectionsmicrobiological diagnosispre-analytical processingprosthetic joint infectionUltra-Turrax®

Identifiers

PMID41594285
PMCPMC12840404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.