ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Detection of Periapical Lesions Using Artificial Intelligence: A Narrative Review.
Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Automated Detection and Ordinal Severity Grading of Periapical Lesions on Panoramic Radiographs Using a Lesion-Preserving Tiling and Ordinal-Aware YOLO Framework.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Can artificial intelligence diagnose the invisible? A scenario-based evaluation of AI performance in cracked tooth diagnosis.Odontology · 2026Article
- Diagnostic Performance of AI-Based Cloud Software Regarding the Detection of Endodontic Findings on CBCT: A Single-Centre Cross-Sectional Validation Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- AI-assisted versus traditional radiographic interpretation for early caries detection.Bioinformation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Periapical lesions (PALs) are a common sequela of pulpal pathology, and accurate radiographic detection is essential for successful endodontic diagnosis and treatment outcome. With recent advancements in Artificial Intelligence (AI), deep learning systems have shown remarkable potential to enhance the diagnostic accuracy of PALs. This study highlights recent evidence on the use of AI-based systems in detecting PALs across various imaging modalities. These include intraoral periapical radiographs (IOPAs), panoramic radiographs (OPGs), and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). A literature search was conducted for peer-reviewed studies published from January 2021 to July 2025 evaluating artificial intelligence for detecting periapical lesions on IOPA, OPGs, or CBCT. PubMed/MEDLINE and Google Scholar were searched using relevant MeSH terms, and reference lists were hand screened. Data were extracted on imaging modality, AI model type, sample size, subgroup characteristics, ground truth, and outcomes, and then qualitatively synthesized by imaging modality and clinically relevant moderators (i.e., lesion size, tooth type and anatomical surroundings, root-filling status and effect on clinician's performance). Thirty-four studies investigating AI models for detecting periapical lesions on IOPA, OPG, and CBCT images were summarized. Reported diagnostic performance was generally high across radiographic modalities. The study results indicated that AI assistance improved clinicians' performance and reduced interpretation time. Performance varied by clinical context: it was higher for larger lesions and lower around complex surrounding anatomy, such as posterior maxilla. Heterogeneity in datasets, reference standards, and metrics limited pooling and underscores the need for external validation and standardized reporting. Current evidence supports the use of AI as a valuable diagnostic platform adjunct for detecting periapical lesions. However, well-designed, high-quality randomized clinical trials are required to assess the potential implementation of AI in the routine practice of periapical lesion diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.