ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Ocular Involvement in a Pediatric Patient with Geleophysic Dysplasia.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Applications of Photopic Negative Response: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Geleophysic dysplasia (GD) is a rare genetic skeletal disorder belonging to the acromelic group, characterized by short stature, distinctive facial features, thickened skin, and progressive cardiac involvement. We report a case of a 3-year-old boy with GD caused by a heterozygous c.5198G>A variant in the FBN1 gene, presenting with ocular abnormalities. The patient demonstrated coarse facial features, short hands and feet, and a history of mitral valve stenosis requiring mechanical valve replacement. He was referred to the ophthalmology department for evaluation of left eye strabismus and elevated intraocular pressure. Fundus examination revealed a pink optic disc with blurred margins, slightly elevated above the retinal plane, absent foveal reflex, and tortuous vessels, consistent with optic disc drusen on ocular ultrasonography. Photopic negative response (PhNR) testing showed markedly reduced amplitudes in both eyes, indicating retinal ganglion cell dysfunction. Pattern VEP revealed normal P100 latencies in both eyes, with a 30% reduction in amplitude in the left eye, likely related to poorer fixation. This case highlights optic disc drusen and retinal ganglion cell dysfunction as potential ocular manifestations of geleophysic dysplasia, emphasizing the need for comprehensive ophthalmologic evaluation in affected patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.