ReviewAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Regulation of Antibiotic Use in Livestock: European and International Strategies to Prevent and Control Antimicrobial Resistance and Ensure Animal Welfare.
Review in Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Antimicrobial Use in Dromedary Camels: Off-Label Practices, Welfare Implications, and Antimicrobial Resistance Within a One Health Framework-A Narrative Review.Veterinary sciences · 2026Review
- Effects of a Phytogenic Water Supplement on Selected Cultivable Bacterial Populations and Intestinal Histomorphology in Ross 308 Broiler Chickens Challenged withLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A Combined Intranasal and Parenteral Vaccination Strategy Reduces Morbidity and Antimicrobial Treatments Associated with Bovine Respiratory Disease in Danish Commercial Veal Calves.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The potential of in-ovo probiotics to replace antibiotic growth promoters in broiler diets: Effect on performance, meat quality, cecal fermentation and oxidative stress indicators.Poultry science · 2026Article
- Livestock immunomodulators as alternatives to antimicrobials - a roadmap for the fight against drug resistance.BMC veterinary research · 2026Review
- Strategies for Reducing Antimicrobial Use in Cattle Through Gut Microbiome Modulation: A Systematic Review of Alternatives to Antibiotics.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Review
- Reducing Antibiotic Dependence in Poultry: The Potential of Phytochemicals as Antibiotic Alternatives Against Bacterial Foodborne Pathogens.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2026Review
- Disease-Group-Specific Antimicrobial Use Patterns and Farm-Level Stewardship Features in Large-Scale Hungarian Swine Herds: A Multi-Farm Survey.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Antibiotic-Free Hypothermic Storage of Boar Semen at 5 °C with Next-Day On-Farm Cooling: Fertility and Biosafety Under Field Conditions.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Chloramphenicol Residue Analysis in Food and Environmental Matrices: Regulatory Framework and Advances in Trace-Level Determination.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Dual Immunomodulatory and Anti-Virulence Mechanisms of Curcumin AgainstVeterinary sciences · 2026Article
- Mitigating antimicrobial resistance in the animal industry: reduction strategies and alternatives to antibiotics.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Review
- Modulating the avian cecal microbiome: probiotics in the prevention ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) represents a significant global concern, undermining the efficacy of treatments in both human and veterinary medicine. Livestock production plays a major role in the emergence and dissemination of AMR, primarily due to the extensive use of antibiotics for therapeutic, prophylactic, and metaphylactic purposes. Addressing this multifaceted issue necessitates a One Health approach. At the international level, regulatory frameworks are predominantly non-binding, relying on soft-law instruments developed by the World Health Organization (WHO), the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), and the World Organization for Animal Health (WOAH, formerly OIE), which advocate for harmonized guidelines and national action plans. In contrast, the European Union has implemented binding regulations, including Regulation (EU) 2019/6 and Regulation (EU) 2019/4, which restrict non-essential antimicrobial use (AMU) and reinforce veterinary accountability. Initiatives such as the Farm to Fork Strategy and platforms like ClassyFarm further advance antimicrobial stewardship by integrating animal welfare, sustainability, and access to EU funding. Achieving substantial reductions in AMR within livestock systems requires coordinated, cross-disciplinary, and multi-level governance efforts. The EU model illustrates how enforceable legal frameworks, combined with science-based monitoring and welfare incentives, can facilitate prudent antibiotic use and promote sustainable animal production. This review aims to provide an integrated overview of international and European strategies for regulating antibiotic use in food-producing animals, focusing on how scientific, veterinary and legal perspectives contribute to combating AMR and promoting animal welfare by emphasizing prevention, and a prudent and responsible AMU.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.