Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41594023›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Peer Reporting: Sampling Design and Unbiased Estimates.

Kang Wen, Jianhong Mou, Xin Lu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kang WenCollege of Systems Engineering, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha 410073, China.ORCID 0009-0002-2719-4557
Jianhong MouCollege of Systems Engineering, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha 410073, China.ORCID 0009-0001-6654-7741
Xin LuCollege of Systems Engineering, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha 410073, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3547-6493

Funding

The Hunan Science and Technology Plan Project 2023JJ40685, 2024RC3133The Major Program of Xiangjiang Laboratory 24XJJCYJ01001The National Natural Science Foundation of China 72025405, 72421002, 92467302, 72474223, 72301285The National Science and Technology Major Project for Brain Science and Brain-like Intelligence Technology 2025ZD0215700
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Ego-Centric Sampling Method (ECM) leverages individual-level reports about peers to estimate population proportions within social networks, offering strong privacy protection without requiring full network data. However, the conventional ECM estimator is unbiased only under the restrictive assumption of a homogeneous network, where node degrees are uniform and uncorrelated with attributes. To overcome this limitation, we introduce the Activity Ratio Corrected ECM estimator (ECMac), which exploits network reciprocity to recast the population-proportion problem into an equivalent formulation in edge space. This reformulation relies solely on ego-peer data and explicitly corrects for degree-attribute dependencies, yielding unbiased and stable estimates even in highly heterogeneous networks. Simulations and analyses on real-world networks show that ECMac reduces estimation error by up to 70% compared with the conventional ECM. Our results establish a theoretically grounded and practically scalable framework for unbiased inference in network-based sampling designs.

Indexed as

activity ratiocomplex networksego-networknetwork samplingstatistical inference

Identifiers

PMID41594023
PMCPMC12840051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.