ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Peer Reporting: Sampling Design and Unbiased Estimates.
Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Ego-Centric Sampling Method (ECM) leverages individual-level reports about peers to estimate population proportions within social networks, offering strong privacy protection without requiring full network data. However, the conventional ECM estimator is unbiased only under the restrictive assumption of a homogeneous network, where node degrees are uniform and uncorrelated with attributes. To overcome this limitation, we introduce the Activity Ratio Corrected ECM estimator (ECMac), which exploits network reciprocity to recast the population-proportion problem into an equivalent formulation in edge space. This reformulation relies solely on ego-peer data and explicitly corrects for degree-attribute dependencies, yielding unbiased and stable estimates even in highly heterogeneous networks. Simulations and analyses on real-world networks show that ECMac reduces estimation error by up to 70% compared with the conventional ECM. Our results establish a theoretically grounded and practically scalable framework for unbiased inference in network-based sampling designs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.