Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41593972›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Counterfactual Explanation-Based Cryptocurrency Price Prediction.

Xinxin Luo, Wei Yin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Xinxin LuoSchool of Cyber Science and Engineering, Southeast University, No.2, Southeast University Road, Jiangning District, Nanjing 211189, China.
Wei YinSchool of Cyber Science and Engineering, Southeast University, No.2, Southeast University Road, Jiangning District, Nanjing 211189, China.

Funding

National Social Science Fund of China Program 24BJY093
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While deep learning models have demonstrated superior performance in cryptocurrency forecasting, their deployment is often hindered by a lack of interpretability and trustworthiness. To bridge this gap, this paper proposes the Cryptocurrency Counterfactual Explanation (CryptoForecastCF) model. Recognizing the inherent volatility and complex non-linear dynamics of cryptocurrency markets, we argue that understanding the sensitivity of model outputs to slight variations in historical conditions is fundamental to robust risk management. CryptoForecastCF employs a gradient-based optimization strategy to generate meaningful counterfactual explanations. Specifically, it identifies minimal modifications, defined as the optimal perturbations to historical market features such as price constrained by ℓ1 or ℓ2 norms, that are sufficient to steer the model's future predictions into user-specified target intervals. This approach not only elucidates the key driving factors and decision boundaries of opaque models but also equips traders and risk managers with actionable insights, enabling them to identify the specific market shifts required to navigate high-stakes scenarios and mitigate unfavorable predictive outcomes.

Indexed as

counterfactual explanationcryptocurrencytime series prediction

Identifiers

PMID41593972
PMCPMC12840074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.