ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Interpreting Performance of Deep Neural Networks with Partial Information Decomposition.
Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Robustness to distributional shifts remains a critical limitation for deploying deep neural networks (DNNs) in real-world applications. While DNNs excel in standard benchmarks, their performance often deteriorates under unseen or perturbed conditions. Understanding how internal information representations relate to such robustness remains underexplored. In this work, we propose an interpretable framework for robustness assessment based on partial information decomposition (PID), which quantifies how neurons redundantly, uniquely, or synergistically encode task-relevant information. Analysis of PID measures computed from clean inputs reveals that models characterized by higher redundancy rates and lower synergy rates tend to maintain more stable performance under various natural corruptions. Additionally, a higher rate of unique information is positively associated with improved classification accuracy on the data from which the measure is computed. These findings provide new insights for understanding and comparing model behavior through internal information analysis, and highlight the feasibility of lightweight robustness assessment without requiring extensive access to corrupted data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.