Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41593943›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Literal Pattern Analysis of Texts Written with the Multiple Form of Characters: A Comparative Study of the Human and Machine Styles.

Kazuya Hayata

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Kazuya HayataSapporo Gakuin University, Ebetsu 069-8555, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-3892-7314

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aside from languages having no form of written expression, it is usually the case with every language on this planet that texts are written in a single character. But every rule has its exceptions. A very rare exception is Japanese, the texts of which are written in the three kinds of characters. In European languages, no one can find a text written in a mixture of the Latin, Cyrillic, and Greek alphabets. For several Japanese texts currently available, we conduct a quantitative analysis of how the three characters are mixed using a methodology based on a binary pattern approach to the sequence that has been generated by a procedure. Specifically, we consider two different texts in the former and present constitutions as well as a famous American story that has been translated at least 13 times into Japanese. For the latter, a comparison is made among the human translations and four machine translations by DeepL and Google Translate. As metrics of divergence and diversity, the Hellinger distance, chi-square value, normalized Shannon entropy, and Simpson's diversity index are employed. Numerical results suggest that in terms of the entropy, the 17 translations consist of three clusters, and that overall, the machine-translated texts exhibit entropy higher than the human translations. The finding suggests that the present method can provide a tool useful for stylometry and author attribution. Finally, through comparison with the diversity index, capabilities of the entropic measure are confirmed. Lastly, in addition to the abovementioned texts, applicability to the Japanese version of the periodic table of elements is investigated.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencebacktranslationchi-square testliteral patternmachine translationnormalized entropySimpson’s diversity index

Identifiers

PMID41593943
PMCPMC12840514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.