Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41593941›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Estimation of Information Flow-Based Causality with Coarsely Sampled Time Series.

X San Liang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

X San LiangDepartment of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai 200438, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8472-3211

Funding

National Science Foundation of China (NSFC) 42230105Shanghai Institute for Mathematics and Interdisciplinary Sciences (SIMIS) SIMIS-ID-2025-CA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The past decade has seen growing applications of the information flow-based causality analysis, particularly with the concise formula of its maximum likelihood estimator. At present, the algorithm for its estimation is based on differential dynamical systems, which, however, may raise an issue for coarsely sampled time series. Here, we show that, for linear systems, this is suitable at least qualitatively, but, for highly nonlinear systems, the bias increases significantly as the sampling frequency is reduced. This study provides a partial solution to this problem, showing how causality analysis can be made faithful with coarsely sampled series, provided that the statistics are sufficient. The key point here is that, instead of working with a Lie algebra, we turn to work with its corresponding Lie group. An explicit and concise formula is obtained, with only sample covariances involved. It is successfully applied to a system comprising a pair of coupled Rössler oscillators. Particularly remarkable is the success when the two oscillators are nearly synchronized. As more often than not observations may be scarce, this solution, albeit partial, is very timely.

Indexed as

coarsely sampled time seriesFrobenius-Perron operatorinformation flowLie groupquantitative causalityRössler systemsynchronization

Identifiers

PMID41593941
PMCPMC12839638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.