Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41593918›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Quantifying Knowledge Production Efficiency with Thermodynamics: A Data-Driven Study of Scientific Concepts.

Artem Chumachenko, Brett Buttliere

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Artem ChumachenkoCentre for European Regional and Local Studies (EUROREG), Science Studies Laboratory, University of Warsaw, Krakowskie Przedmieście 30, 00-927 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-1801-8933
Brett ButtliereCentre for European Regional and Local Studies (EUROREG), Science Studies Laboratory, University of Warsaw, Krakowskie Przedmieście 30, 00-927 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-5025-0460

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We develop a data-driven framework for analyzing how scientific concepts evolve through their empirical in-text frequency distributions in large text corpora. For each concept, the observed distribution is paired with a maximum entropy equilibrium reference, which takes a generalized Boltzmann form determined by two measurable statistical moments. Using data from more than 500,000 physics papers (about 13,000 concepts, 2000-2018), we reconstruct the temporal trajectories of the associated MaxEnt parameters and entropy measures, and we identify two characteristic regimes of concept dynamics, stable and driven, separated by a transition point near criticality. Departures from equilibrium are quantified using a residual-information measure that captures how much structure a concept exhibits beyond its equilibrium baseline. To analyze temporal change, we adapt the Hatano-Sasa and Esposito-Van den Broeck decomposition to discrete time and separate maintenance-like contributions from externally driven reorganization. The proposed efficiency indicators describe how concepts sustain or reorganize their informational structure under a finite representational capacity. Together, these elements provide a unified and empirically grounded description of concept evolution in scientific communication, based on equilibrium references, nonequilibrium structure, and informational work.

Indexed as

entopy-energy bondfinite systemsHatano–Sasa decompositioninformation efficiencyinstantaneous fixed point (IFP)irreversible workmaximum entropy principlenonequilibrium thermodynamicsphase transitionresidual entropythermodynamics of information

Identifiers

PMID41593918
PMCPMC12840305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.