Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41593869›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of technology assessment in health care2026

Innovating HTA: a call for capacity building and standardization.

Diana M J Delnoij, Dalia M Dawoud, Jamie Elvidge, Zoltan Kaló, Saskia Knies, Bertalan Németh, Wim Goettsch

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of technology assessment in health care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Diana M J Delnoijhttps://ror.org/038b4c997National Health Care Institute, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2066-9604
Dalia M DawoudScience, Evidence and Analytics, https://ror.org/015ah0c92National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, UK.
Jamie ElvidgeHealth Technology Innovation Laboratory (HTA Lab), https://ror.org/015ah0c92National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6154-8091
Zoltan Kalóhttps://ror.org/00bsxeq86Syreon Research Institute, Hungary.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7762-2607
Saskia Knieshttps://ror.org/038b4c997National Health Care Institute, Netherlands.
Bertalan Némethhttps://ror.org/00bsxeq86Syreon Research Institute, Hungary.
Wim Goettschhttps://ror.org/038b4c997National Health Care Institute, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8022-7496

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesNew technologies are being developed in a context of scarcity. Health technology assessment (HTA) aims to support decision makers in providing equitable and affordable access to effective innovations. This study aims to summarize the policy-related findings of a Horizon2020 project on innovating HTA methods and discuss their implications for the governance of HTA in Europe.

methodsA thematic analysis of policy-oriented papers (

resultsReported challenges included a lack of access to standardized data, differences in evidentiary needs, existing policy structures, and a lack of capacity and knowledge. Suggested solutions were capacity building, national and international dialogues, standardization, and increased European collaboration. Stakeholders had different expectations with respect to the likely success of these solutions.

conclusionInnovation of HTA requires alignment of evidentiary needs through dialogues, standardization through increased European collaboration, and capacity building. However, without additional investments in personnel capacity, HTA agencies must still prioritize some activities at the expense of others. Furthermore, although European collaboration is important, global alignment might be required to enforce standardization.

Indexed as

Capacity BuildingTechnology Assessment, BiomedicalDecision MakingEuropeHumansInternational CooperationPolicy Makingcapacity buildingEuropean collaborationhealth technology assessmentinnovationreal-world evidence

Identifiers

PMID41593869
PMCPMC12902166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.