ArticleKnee surgery & related research2026
Effects of axial malrotation on posterior tibial slope measurement: a digitally reconstructed radiograph study enabling automated quality assessment.
Article in Knee surgery & related research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- U-Net-Based Automated Quality Control of Knee Radiographs: Dual-Center Validation and Clinical Intervention.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAccurate measurement of posterior tibial slope (PTS) is highly sensitive to axial malrotation of the knee during acquisition, but its impact has not been systematically quantified across different anatomical variations. This simulation study aimed to quantify the effect of axial malrotation on PTS using digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRRs) and suggest a practical marker for filtering out low-quality images with excessive malrotation. MATERIALS AND
methodsA total of 55 preoperative computed tomography (CT) scans from January 2021 to December 2024 in a single, tertiary hospital were retrospectively reviewed. DRRs were generated from those scans to simulate lateral knee radiographs with malrotation ranging from -12° to +12° relative to an anatomically aligned baseline. An artificial-intelligence (AI)-based tool automatically measured PTS on each DRR, with agreement evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). PCDR was calculated from femoral contours and analyzed for correlation with malrotation angles and resulting PTS measurement error.
resultsAI-based PTS measurements on DRRs showed good agreement with expert annotations (ICC = 0.78, 95% CI 0.73-0.82). PTS increased linearly with internal rotation, with each 1° of rotation resulting in approximately 0.2° change in PTS (R
conclusionsCT-derived DRRs combined with AI analysis showed that PTS measurement error proportionately increased with axial malrotation. Identifying and excluding radiographs with excessive rotation improves the reliability of slope-based assessments and supports more accurate surgical planning. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, retrospective cohort study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.