ArticleClinical epigenetics2026
Differential transcriptomic modulation by histone deacetylase inhibitor SAHA in LUAD and LUSC.
Article in Clinical epigenetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHistone deacetylases (HDACs) are central epigenetic regulators in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), yet responses to HDAC inhibitors (HDACi) vary markedly between lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) and lung squamous carcinoma (LUSC). We asked how the pan-HDAC inhibitor suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (SAHA, vorinostat) rewires lineage-specific transcriptional programs and whether SAHA-aligned modules of genes, rather than individual loci, capture clinically relevant vulnerabilities in each subtype.
methodsLUAD-like NCI-H1299 (TP53
resultsSAHA reprogrammed the transcriptome in both lines (1,098 DEGs in H1299; 1,532 in H1703), enforcing a shared suppression of E2F/G2-M programs but diverging in non-cell-cycle outputs. In LUAD-like H1299, SAHA upregulated morphogenesis/adhesion and KRAS_SIGNALING_DN/EMT-adjacent signatures while dampening interferon/stress pathways, and significantly reduced migration at low dose. In LUSC-like H1703, SAHA triggered a dominant cell-cycle checkpoint shutdown coupled to complement/ECM and inflammatory induction, with stronger apoptosis but only modest short-term migration restraint. Survival-anchored analysis yielded four SAHA feature-sensing modules; the LUAD_RISK module was enriched for cell-cycle/mitotic genes and was attenuated by SAHA, whereas the LUSC_RISK module captured checkpoint, ECM, and stress-response programs preferentially down-regulated in H1703. Both risk modules stratified prognosis and were linked to distinct HDAC-centred neighbourhoods (HDAC7/9-LUAD_RISK and HDAC4/6-LUSC_RISK) in TCGA tumours.
conclusionsSAHA imposes a common anti-proliferative core but engages distinct lineage-conditioned risk modules in LUAD and LUSC-cell-cycle/migration-linked in LUAD and checkpoint/stress-linked in LUSC. These SAHA feature-sensing modules provide a mechanistic and clinically anchored framework for subtype-tailored HDAC-directed combinations and for future development of HDACi-aligned biomarkers in NSCLC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.