ReviewBiomarker research2026
In vivo engineering of CAR-T cells: delivery strategies and clinical translation.
Review in Biomarker research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advanced gene editing technologies for oncology mechanisms, applications, and clinical implementation.Cancer gene therapy · 2026Review
- In Vivo mRNA-Lipid Nanoparticle CAR-T Cell Engineering: Advances, Challenges, and Clinical Translation.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- The New Wave of Gene and Cell Therapies Across Diseases.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Functional genomics-guided design of CAR-T and CAR-NK therapies in hematological malignancies: aligning cellular engineering with immune escape and microenvironmental resistance.Frontiers in genome editing · 2026Review
- Engineering CAR-T cells for solid tumors: overcoming antigenic, trafficking, and microenvironmental barriers.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Delivery platforms forFrontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Plying potency assays for immunotherapy of solid tumors.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Rewiring the immune response in lung cancer: current progress in bispecific antibodies, CAR-T therapy, and the rise ofFrontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy has transformed the treatment landscape for hematologic malignancies. Nonetheless, its broad clinical adoption is constrained by the logistical, financial, and safety burdens associated with ex vivo cell manufacturing. In vivo CAR-T engineering has emerged as a transformative alternative, enabling the direct reprogramming of endogenous T cells through systemic delivery of CAR-encoding constructs via viral or non-viral vectors. This strategy eliminates the need for leukapheresis, genetic modification, and reinfusion, paving the way for simplified, scalable, and potentially “off-the-shelf” immunotherapies. While challenges such as cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) remain shared hurdles, in vivo approaches introduce added complexities, including vector immunogenicity and innate immune sensing. By leveraging RNA-based platforms, in vivo CAR-T engineering is evolving into a programmable immunotherapy modality beyond oncology. At the same time, regulatory frameworks for systemic in vivo reprogramming remain underdeveloped, underscoring the need for harmonized guidelines that balance innovation with patient safety. This review synthesizes progress across major delivery platforms, analyzes key translational and regulatory barriers specific to in vivo approaches, and highlights emerging innovations in vector tropism, immune modulation, and scalable manufacturing. As the field matures, in vivo CAR-T strategies may unlock broader therapeutic applications across oncology and autoimmune disease, redefining the accessibility and precision of cellular immunotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.