ArticleEuropean journal of medical research2026
Construction of a nomogram prediction model for prolonged ICU length of stay in patients with sepsis-induced coagulopathy.
Article in European journal of medical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting prolonged intensive care unit stay in patients with acute myocardial infarction and analysis of associated hospitalization costs.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo develop and evaluate a nomogram model for predicting prolonged ICU length of stay (LOS) in patients with sepsis-induced coagulopathy (SIC), identify associated risk factors, and facilitate early identification of high-risk patients, with the aim of optimizing clinical management strategies, improving patient outcomes, and enhancing ICU resource utilization.
methodA total of 3728 patients meeting the diagnostic criteria of International Society for Thrombosis and Hemostasis (ISTH) criteria were included from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC-IV) database. Based on the third quartile value of ICU LOS in the cohort, patients were categorized into a prolonged ICU LOS group (≥ 5 days) and a non-prolonged ICU LOS group (< 5 days). General demographic data, clinical characteristics, and laboratory test results within 24 h of ICU admission were collected to identify independent risk factors for prolonged ICU LOS in SIC patients. Predictive variables were selected using LASSO-logistic regression combined with Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) for interpretability. A nomogram model was constructed and evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA).
resultsAmong the 3728 enrolled patients, 832 had a prolonged ICU LOS (≥ 5 days), while 2896 had a non-prolonged ICU LOS (< 5 days). LASSO-logistic regression and SHAP analysis identified six predictive variables: SOFA score, heart rate, monocyte percentage, acute kidney injury (AKI), use of vasopressors, and use of mechanical ventilation. The nomogram demonstrated an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.737 (95% CI 0.716-0.758).
conclusionRisk factors for prolonged LOS in patients with SIC included: increased SOFA score, elevated heart rate, higher monocyte percentage, occurrence of AKI, use of vasopressors, and use of mechanical ventilation. By integrating these readily available clinical indicators into an intuitive nomogram, we have developed a practical risk assessment tool for clinicians. This tool aids in the identification of SIC patients at risk for prolonged hospitalization. Furthermore, our analysis revealed that prolonged LOS was significantly associated with increased long-term mortality. The application of this predictive model may ultimately contribute to reducing ICU length of stay and improving patient prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.