Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41593698›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of medical research2026

Invasive ventilation and mortality in critically ill nonagenarians: a retrospective cohort study.

Markus Haar, Fabian Gleibs, Anna Carola Hertrich, Jakob Müller, Rikus Daniels, Pauline Theile, Stefan Kluge, Kevin Roedl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of medical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Markus HaarDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20251, Hamburg, Germany.
Fabian GleibsDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20251, Hamburg, Germany.
Anna Carola HertrichDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20251, Hamburg, Germany.
Jakob MüllerDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Tabea Hospital Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Rikus DanielsDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20251, Hamburg, Germany.
Pauline TheileDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20251, Hamburg, Germany.
Stefan KlugeDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20251, Hamburg, Germany.
Kevin RoedlDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20251, Hamburg, Germany. k.roedl@uke.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundICU admissions among very old patients are increasing. Invasive ventilation (IV) is common, but its benefit in patients aged ≥ 90 years is uncertain given high mortality and ethical concerns.

methodsThis retrospective cohort study analysed all consecutive ICU patients aged ≥ 90 years admitted between 2008 and 2023 at a tertiary care centre in Germany. Demographic, clinical, and outcome data were extracted from electronic health records. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify predictors of hospital mortality, while Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards regression were used to assess predictors of 1-year mortality.

resultsOf 113,950 patients, 1422 (1.25%) aged ≥ 90 years were identified (median 92 years, IQR 91-94; 66% female). IV was administered to 434 patients (31%), while 988 (69%) were not invasively ventilated. Median ICU length of stay was 1.7 days (IQR 1-4) overall. Among ventilated patients, the median duration of IV was 13 h (IQR 4-44), and 66% received IV for less than 24 h. IV was associated with higher illness severity at admission (SOFA score 9 [IQR 7-11] vs. 2 [IQR 1-4], p < 0.001), longer ICU stays (2.9 days [IQR 1.1-7.4] vs. 1.5 days [IQR 0.9-3.1], p < 0.001), as well as higher requirement of vasopressors at admission (0.112 µg/kg/min [IQR 0.056-0.278] vs. 0.072 µg/kg/min [IQR 0.038-0.133], p < 0.001) and renal replacement therapy (3.5% [n = 15] vs. 1.7% [n = 17], p = 0.042). In patients requiring IV, ICU and hospital mortality were 35.7% (n = 155) and 49.3% (n = 214) vs. 11.5% (n = 114) and 21.5% (n = 212) in non-IV patients, respectively (both p < 0.001). Independent and significant predictors of hospital mortality included prolonged IV duration (> 72 h: OR 4.01), peak lactate ≥ 4 mmol/l within 72 h (OR 6.67), as well as elevated SOFA scores (4-7: OR 1.96, ≥ 8: OR 3.46), and CCI ≥ 3 (OR 1.74) at admission. One-year mortality risks were 73.2% (95% CI 68.5-77.3%) and 53.4% (95% CI 50.0-56.6%) for IV and no-IV patients (p < 0.001), respectively.

conclusionsIn this selected cohort of ICU patients aged ≥ 90 years, invasive ventilation-particularly beyond 72 h-identified a subgroup with very high ICU and hospital mortality and greater illness severity. These observational data support using invasive ventilation in nonagenarians as a trigger for early, patient-centred goals-of-care discussions, rather than as evidence that ventilation itself causes excess mortality.

Indexed as

Critical illnessElderlyIntensive careInvasive ventilationNonagenariansSurvival analysis

Identifiers

PMID41593698
PMCPMC12924332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.