ArticleGenome biology2026
Circularization of 23S rRNA but not 16S rRNA within archaeal ribosomes.
Article in Genome biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A family of archaeal hibernation factors that bind in tandem and protect ribosomes in dormant cells.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Archaeal RNA processing and regulation: expanding the functional landscape.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundProcessing of archaeal 16S and 23S rRNAs is believed to involve excision of individual rRNAs from polycistronic precursors, circularization of excised rRNAs, and re-linearization before the incorporation into ribosomes. However, all the knowledge is derived from several isolated species, leaving open the possibility that different processes may occur in other archaeal groups.
resultsHere, we investigate rRNAs from diverse and mostly uncultivated archaea. Sequencing of total cellular RNA from eight phylum-level lineages indicates that archaeal circular 23S rRNA transcript abundances vastly exceed those of linear counterparts, and linear versions are often undetectable. As the majority of rRNAs derive from mature ribosomes, the data suggest that ribosomes contain circular 23S rRNAs. Thus, we directly sequence RNA extracted from isolated ribosomes of a model archaeon, Methanosarcina acetivorans, and confirm that the 23S rRNAs in the ribosomes are circular. Structural modeling places the 5' and 3' ends of the linear precursors of archaeal 23S rRNAs in close proximity to form a GNRA tetraloop (in which N is A, C, G, or U and R is A or G), consistent with their existence as circular molecules. We also confirm the existence of circular 16S rRNA intermediates in transcriptomes of most archaea, yet a circular form is not evident in some distinct archaeal groups, suggesting that certain archaea do not circularize 16S rRNA during processing.
conclusionsOur findings uncover unexpected variations in the processing required to generate mature rRNAs and the conformation of functional molecules in archaeal ribosomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.