Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41593638›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2026

Privacy-preserving data quality assessment for federated health data networks.

Radovan Tomášik, Tobias Kussel, Zdenka Dudová, Radoslava Kacová, Roman Hrstka, Martin Lablans, Petr Holub

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Radovan TomášikFaculty of Informatics, Masaryk University, Botanicka, 68a, Brno, Jihomoravsky Kraj, 60200, Czechia. radovan.tomasik@bbmri-eric.eu.
Tobias KusselFederated Information Systems, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Zdenka DudováBank of Biological Material, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Zluty Kopec 7, Brno, Jihomoravsky Kraj, 60200, Czechia.
Radoslava KacováFaculty of Informatics, Masaryk University, Botanicka, 68a, Brno, Jihomoravsky Kraj, 60200, Czechia.
Roman HrstkaBank of Biological Material, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Zluty Kopec 7, Brno, Jihomoravsky Kraj, 60200, Czechia.
Martin LablansFederated Information Systems, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Petr HolubBBMRI-ERIC, Neue Stiftingtalstrasse, 2/B/6, Graz, 8010, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAssessing data quality in federated health data systems presents unique challenges, particularly when data custodians cannot expose raw data due to privacy regulations. Traditional quality assessment approaches often require centralised access, which conflicts with the principles of data sovereignty and confidentiality.

methodsIn this study, we evaluate the utility of federated data quality assessment with differential privacy techniques to safeguard sensitive health data. The aim is to develop tooling and demonstrate a proof-of-concept implementation over a synthetic dataset of observational medical data.

resultsWe present a privacy-preserving framework for evaluating data quality in federated environments using differential privacy. Our approach enables individual data providers to compute local quality metrics and share only aggregated, privacy-protected results. We implement a proof-of-concept that supports predefined quality checks across different data models and demonstrate how meaningful insights into data quality can be obtained without compromising sensitive information.

conclusionThis work demonstrates that differential privacy can be effectively applied to enable federated quality assessment in health data networks without compromising individual privacy. By implementing a proof-of-concept system over synthetic health data, we show that it is possible to obtain meaningful quality metrics in a decentralised setting.

Indexed as

Computer SecurityConfidentialityData AccuracyPrivacyFederated LearningHumansBBMRICQLData qualityDifferential privacyFederated dataMedical informatics

Identifiers

PMID41593638
PMCPMC12918291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.