ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2026
Privacy-preserving data quality assessment for federated health data networks.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Federated analytics for non-communicable disease surveillance in the European health data space: a scoping review and conceptual framework.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAssessing data quality in federated health data systems presents unique challenges, particularly when data custodians cannot expose raw data due to privacy regulations. Traditional quality assessment approaches often require centralised access, which conflicts with the principles of data sovereignty and confidentiality.
methodsIn this study, we evaluate the utility of federated data quality assessment with differential privacy techniques to safeguard sensitive health data. The aim is to develop tooling and demonstrate a proof-of-concept implementation over a synthetic dataset of observational medical data.
resultsWe present a privacy-preserving framework for evaluating data quality in federated environments using differential privacy. Our approach enables individual data providers to compute local quality metrics and share only aggregated, privacy-protected results. We implement a proof-of-concept that supports predefined quality checks across different data models and demonstrate how meaningful insights into data quality can be obtained without compromising sensitive information.
conclusionThis work demonstrates that differential privacy can be effectively applied to enable federated quality assessment in health data networks without compromising individual privacy. By implementing a proof-of-concept system over synthetic health data, we show that it is possible to obtain meaningful quality metrics in a decentralised setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.