ArticleBMC health services research2026
"We're all just trying to do right by our patients": a qualitative study of healthcare and research personnel's moral experiences of engaging with COVID-19 research during the first wave of the pandemic.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough research plays a critical role during emerging pandemics such as COVID-19, clinical care and public health priorities may be in tension with research priorities at times. This study aimed to better understand the on-the-ground realities and experiences of those who worked at the intersections of research and clinical care early in the COVID-19 pandemic to clarify the ethical dimensions of pandemic research and the support needs of those involved. The research question guiding this inquiry was: What were healthcare and research personnel's moral experiences of engaging with COVID-19 research during the first wave of the pandemic?
methodsThis Interpretive Description study included 26 semi-structured telephone or virtual interviews with healthcare and research personnel conducted between May and September 2020 to explore their moral experiences related to involvement in COVID-19 research. Data were analyzed inductively using constant comparative techniques.
resultsThe overarching theme characterizing participants' moral experiences was trying to do right by their patients in the midst of the storm. Five sub-themes included: (1) striving for evidence-based practice in the absence of evidence, (2) struggling to balance speed, ethical standards, and rigour, (3) advocating for patients in the rush to develop COVID-19 evidence, (4) bearing the burdens and risks of conducting COVID-19 research, and (5) feeling part of something bigger.
conclusionsStudy findings raise questions regarding what it means to be a good physician, nurse, or healthcare professional in the absence of evidence and amidst pressures to generate it quickly. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.