Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41593621›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2026

Tool for Nursing Acuity Measurement - Swedish version (NAM-S) for somatic in-patient care: development, validity, and reliability.

Kristin Dellesjö, Maria Engström, Annica Björkman, Karin Myrberg

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kristin DellesjöFaculty of Health and Occupational Studies, Department of Caring Sciences, University of Gävle, Gävle, Sweden. kristin.dellesjo@hig.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-9977-2453
Maria EngströmFaculty of Health and Occupational Studies, Department of Caring Sciences, University of Gävle, Gävle, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9912-5350
Annica BjörkmanFaculty of Health and Occupational Studies, Department of Caring Sciences, University of Gävle, Gävle, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9513-3102
Karin MyrbergFaculty of Health and Occupational Studies, Department of Caring Sciences, University of Gävle, Gävle, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7934-0109

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNursing acuity measurements refer to the assessments of the intensity of nursing care required by a patient, helping to determine appropriate levels of nursing resources and staffing requirements. The aim of this paper is to describe the development and validation of a tool for measuring nursing acuity within adult somatic in-patient care settings, distinguishing between advanced nursing tasks and basic nursing tasks.

methodThe nursing acuity tool was developed through an iterative process in the context of a Swedish healthcare region. The methodological process involved a literature search, exploration of non-validated tools used within Swedish healthcare, and nursing staff discussions to reach a conceptual tool. This tool underwent pilot testing across five wards, as well as testing for content- and construct validity, and inter-rater reliability.

resultsAfter an iterative process of development and testing, we reached a final version of a tool, subsequently named the Swedish Nursing Acuity Measurement (NAM-S). The results demonstrated acceptable validity and inter-rater reliability.

conclusionsOur study provided support that the NAM-S can be used for assessing nursing acuity within adult somatic in-patient care. To refine the model, further examinations of its usefulness and experiences of the practical use of NAM-S are warranted.

Indexed as

Nursing Staff, HospitalPatient AcuityHumansReproducibility of ResultsSwedenNursing acuityNursing intensityNursing workloadPatient acuityPatient classificationPsychometric propertiesReliabilitySomatic careTool developmentValidity

Identifiers

PMID41593621
PMCPMC12918532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.