Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41593618›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2026

No short cuts: building trust in community-based research with ethnocultural groups.

Diya Chowdhury, Joanie Sims-Gould, Heather McKay

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for equity in health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Diya ChowdhuryActive Aging Research Team, University of British Columbia, 2635 Laurel St, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1M9, Canada. diya.chowdhury@ubc.ca.
Joanie Sims-GouldActive Aging Research Team, University of British Columbia, 2635 Laurel St, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1M9, Canada.
Heather McKayActive Aging Research Team, University of British Columbia, 2635 Laurel St, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1M9, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Racialized immigrant older adults (RIOAs) in Canada and other Global North countries face significant health inequities, yet remain underrepresented in health research and lack culturally appropriate health programs. While trust-building is essential for equitable community-engaged research, it requires time-intensive efforts to address cultural nuances, systemic barriers, and historical harms—often conflicting with institutional pressures for efficiency. This commentary explores the tension between trust-building and expediency in research with RIOAs, drawing on nine years of community-engaged research and existing literature. We argue that current research systems must evolve to prioritize trust as a fundamental requirement, not an optional step. Without systemic changes—including flexible timelines, dedicated resources for relationship-building, and institutional recognition of community-engaged work—research risks perpetuating harm to marginalized populations. We propose actionable strategies to balance trust and efficiency, such as leveraging existing community partnerships, co-creating research designs, and fostering reciprocity. Future research could systematically evaluate engagement approaches, quantify the costs of meaningful trust-building, and develop frameworks that center cultural safety and power-sharing. Trust cannot remain an assumed ideal; it must become an operational priority to ensure research benefits the communities it seeks to serve.

Indexed as

Community-Based Participatory ResearchEmigrants and ImmigrantsTrustCanadaHumans

Identifiers

PMID41593618
PMCPMC12837443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.