ArticleBMC biology2026
Synonymous codon usage defines functional gene families.
Article in BMC biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe degeneracy of the genetic code is increasingly recognized for roles in regulating translation rate, protein folding, and cell response. However, the functional genomics of codon usage patterns remains poorly defined. We previously showed that prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells respond to individual stresses by uniquely reprogramming the tRNA pool and the dozens of tRNA modifications comprising the tRNA epitranscriptome to cause selective translation of mRNAs from codon-biased stress response genes. Here, we tested the hypothesis that functional gene families have distinct values of codon bias in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome by modeling isoacceptor codon distributions using a new approach-analysis of synonymous codon signatures (ASCS).
resultsApplication of ASCS to the S. cerevisiae genome revealed linear relationships between patterns of codon bias and gene function using canonical correlation analysis. By mapping codon-biased open reading frames (ORFs) onto a functional network of gene ontology (GO) categories, we identified 91 gene families distinguished by unique codon usage signatures. The codon usage patterns were found to strongly predict functional clusters of genes, such as translational machinery, transcription, and metabolic processes.
conclusionsThe ASCS-derived model of codon usage patterns in S. cerevisiae reveals functional codon bias signatures and captures more biologically meaningful information when compared to other codon analytical approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.