Observational studyBMC pregnancy and childbirth2026
Analysis of caesarean section rates according to the Robson classification system and indications for caesarean delivery: experience from a tertiary health centre in Turkey.
Observational study in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGlobally and in Turkey, caesarean section (CS) rates have risen steadily over recent decades, reflecting changes in clinical practice, maternal preference, medico-legal concerns, and healthcare system dynamics. The Robson Ten-Group Classification System, complemented by analysis of CS indications, provides a standardised and objective framework for identifying modifiable factors contributing to the increasing use of CS. This study aimed to evaluate CS rates in a tertiary healthcare centre in Turkey using the Robson classification in conjunction with specific clinical indications.
methodsThis retrospective observational study included all women who delivered at Umraniye Training and Research Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, between 01 August 2018 and 11 September 2025. Data were obtained from the hospital’s electronic birth registry and categorised according to the Robson Ten-Group Classification System and indications for CS.
resultsDuring the study period, 25,767 births were recorded, of which 11,939 (46.4%) were delivered by CS. The most significant contribution to the overall CS rate originated from Robson Group 5 (23.8%), followed by Group 1 (5.2%). The most common indication for CS was previous uterine surgery, including prior CS and/or myomectomy (54.9%), followed by foetal distress (19.1%).
conclusionThe overall CS rate in this study was 46.4%, with Robson Groups 5 and 1 accounting for the majority of procedures (29.0% combined). Previous uterine surgery and foetal distress were the predominant indications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.