SynthesisBMC oral health2026
Comparative effectiveness of probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics, and postbiotics in preventing dental caries: a meta-analysis from an oral microbiota modulation perspective.
Synthesis in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDental caries remains one of the most prevalent non-communicable diseases worldwide, imposing substantial health and economic burdens despite conventional preventive measures such as fluoride use and oral hygiene. Increasing recognition of caries as a dysbiosis-driven biofilm disease has prompted exploration of microbiota-modulating strategies, including probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics, and postbiotics.
aimThis systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the effectiveness of probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics, and postbiotics in preventing dental caries and to assess associated microbiological and ecological outcomes.
methodsA comprehensive search of MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, Web of Science, Scopus, trial registries, and grey literature was performed from inception to 2024. Randomized controlled trials and controlled clinical trials assessing caries outcomes or validated intermediate endpoints were included. Data extraction and risk-of-bias assessments were conducted independently by two reviewers. Random-effects meta-analysis was applied to estimate pooled risk ratios (RRs) with subgroup analyses by age, strain, delivery format, and duration. Certainty of evidence was graded using GRADE methodology.
resultsTwenty-five studies met inclusion criteria; 18 randomized trials contributed to meta-analysis. Probiotics demonstrated the strongest clinical signal. In pediatric populations (12 RCTs; n ≈ 2,300), probiotics significantly reduced new or progressive caries (RR = 0.80; 95% CI, 0.68–0.95). Adult probiotic trials (6 RCTs; n ≈ 1,100) showed no significant benefit (RR = 0.95; 95% CI, 0.80–1.12). Evidence for prebiotics (n = 3), synbiotics (n = 2), and postbiotics (n = 3) was sparse, heterogeneous, and largely limited to microbiological endpoints, including reductions in Streptococcus mutans and favorable plaque pH shifts. Reported adverse events were mild and infrequent. DISCUSSION: Probiotics, particularly Lactobacillus rhamnosus and L. reuteri delivered via lozenges or dairy products, show moderate-certainty evidence for modest caries prevention in children. Other microbiota-modulating approaches remain promising but under-investigated, constrained by small sample sizes, heterogeneous interventions, and lack of standardized outcomes.
conclusionProbiotics represent a safe and acceptable adjunct to conventional preventive strategies in pediatric populations, though benefits are modest. Prebiotics, synbiotics, and postbiotics require further validation through large, long-term, strain-specific RCTs with standardized clinical endpoints and mechanistic analyses to clarify their role in caries prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.