Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41593522›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2026

Participation of livestock farmers and community animal health workers in one health intervention to control zoonotic diseases in Rwanda: a qualitative study.

Shema Hugor, Jonathan Izudi, Anselme Shyaka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Shema HugorCenter for One Health, University of Global Health Equity (UGHE), Kigali, Rwanda.
Jonathan IzudiDepartment of Community Health, Faculty of Medicine, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda. jonahzd@gmail.com.
Anselme ShyakaCenter for One Health, University of Global Health Equity (UGHE), Kigali, Rwanda. ashyaka@ughe.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn zoonotic disease hotspots, engaging local communities in zoonotic disease monitoring and reporting is essential for effective prevention and early outbreak detection. In Rwanda, the Eastern Province has experienced nearly 90% of all zoonotic disease outbreaks. This qualitative study explored the participation of livestock farmers and community animal health workers (CAHWs) in One Health interventions aimed at controlling zoonotic disease outbreaks in Nyagatare district, Eastern Province, Rwanda.

methodAmong livestock farmers and CAHWs, we collected qualitative data through in-depth interviews and focused group discussions. We held key informant interviews with district-level officials, namely district veterinary, district health, and district environmental health officers, to validate the data from livestock farmers and CAHWs. The data were transcribed verbatim and verified by replaying the audio recordings. Content analysis was performed.

resultsFive major themes emerged as areas of participation: (i) capacity building focused on livestock management and livestock disease identification and prevention; (ii) community-level health education encompassing zoonotic disease risk communication and awareness raising; (iii) interruption of zoonotic disease transmission that comprised infection prevention and control, separation of sick and healthy livestock, quarantine, and zero grazing, adherence to guidelines, and the testing, treatment, spraying, and vaccination of livestock; (iv) collaboration with multiple sectors via training on zoonotic diseases, including its treatment, investigation, and prevention; and 5) zoonotic disease surveillance that included livestock monitoring and inspection for zoonotic diseases and the notification and reporting of zoonotic diseases to relevant authorities. The collaboration between the environmental health sector and the animal and human sectors was weak, while vaccination targeted mainly cattle but not small ruminants.

conclusionsLivestock farmers and CAHWs participate in several One Health interventions aimed at controlling zoonotic diseases, particularly in vaccination campaigns for cattle, community sensitization, and basic animal husbandry practices. However, collaboration between the environmental health sector and the animal and human sectors was weak, vaccination efforts largely excluded small ruminants, and some farmers relied on local herbs for treatment due to limited access to professional veterinary services. Efforts to sustain the major areas of participation are needed, while weaker areas need strengthening.

Indexed as

Community Health WorkersFarmersOne HealthZoonosesAnimalsDisease OutbreaksHumansLivestockQualitative ResearchRwandaCommunity animal health workersOne healthOutbreakRwandaZoonotic diseases

Identifiers

PMID41593522
PMCPMC12918547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.