ArticleBMC geriatrics2026
A novel 'Timing it Right'-based intervention for post-intensive care syndrome in critically ill elderly patients: study protocol and preliminary implementation findings of a randomized controlled trial.
Article in BMC geriatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCritically ill elderly patients face elevated risks of post-intensive care syndrome (PICS) due to unique vulnerabilities, including rapid disease progression, multimorbidity, and multi-organ dysfunction. Current rehabilitation models often lack phase-integrated continuity, creating a significant gap in preventing long-term functional decline. This study aimed to test a novel, time-sequenced "Timing It Right" (TIR) framework spanning the entire post-ICU continuum-from ICU to community reintegration-to reduce the incidence and burden of PICS.
methodsA prospective, randomized controlled trial (RCT; registered at ChiCTR2400083434) with blinded outcome assessment was conducted. The intervention group received TIR-based care, tailored to five specific recovery phases (ICU acute, ICU transition, discharge preparation, post-discharge adjustment, and acclimatization), in addition to usual care. The control group received usual care alone. Feasibility was assessed through strict protocol adherence monitoring and structured multidisciplinary team feedback.
resultsPreliminary implementation in 90 patients confirmed high protocol feasibility, with no major deviations and positive acceptability among the healthcare team. Full outcome analysis is ongoing and will be reported separately. DISCUSSION: The TIR framework directly addresses a critical gap in post-ICU care by providing integrated, stage-specific support. By dynamically aligning interventions with patients' evolving needs, this model holds promise for significantly improving functional outcomes and offers a scalable, efficient template for resource-limited settings.
trial registrationChinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2400083434; registered 25/04/2024.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.