ArticleBMC gastroenterology2026
Genome-wide association and integrative analyses of relative handgrip strength identify polygenic determinants of gastrointestinal disorder susceptibility.
Article in BMC gastroenterology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHand grip strength is a crucial indicator of muscle strength and quality. Yet, there remain significant knowledge gaps in our understanding of the genetic factors that influence hand grip strength and its impact on digestive disorders.
methodsThis study employed data from the UK Biobank, comprising 405,394 individuals of European ancestry, who underwent assessments of both left- and right- hand grip strength at baseline. We calculated the relative hand grip strength (RHGS), defined as the average hand grip strength adjusted for body mass index (BMI). Subsequently, we performed genome-wide association study (GWAS) to identify RHGS-linked variants and genes. We evaluated RHGS’s impact on digestive disorders using linkage disequilibrium score regression (LDSC), Mendelian randomization (MR), Polygenic risk score (PRS), regression models, and interaction analyses.
resultsGWAS of 405,394 Europeans identified 1,111 independent SNPs across 226 autosomal loci and 407 genes associated with RHGS. TWAS with skeletal-muscle eQTLs prioritized genes, including L3MBTL3, CEP192 and NUCKS1, highly expressed in type I/II myocytes and mesenchymal cells. LDSC revealed significant negative genetic correlations between RHGS and abdominal hernia (rg = -0.121, p = 5.00 × 10⁻⁴), diaphragmatic hernia (rg = -0.155, p = 6.33 × 10⁻⁶) and diverticular intestine (rg = -0.141, p = 3.85 × 10⁻¹⁰). MR indicated that one-unit higher genetically predicted RHGS reduced odds of diaphragmatic hernia (OR = 0.45, 95% CI 0.25–0.82), diverticular intestine (OR = 0.42, 0.26–0.66), NAFLD (OR = 0.49, 0.29–0.83) and peptic ulcer (OR = 0.54, 0.31–0.97). Each standard-deviation increase in RHGS PRS was associated with lower risks of abdominal hernia (OR = 0.98), diaphragmatic hernia (OR = 0.96) and diverticular intestine (OR = 0.98) after full adjustment. Gene-environment analyses showed diabetes, hyperlipidemia and smoking attenuated the protective effects from elevated RHGS, whereas cardioprotective diet and higher fiber intake showed synergistic protection on abdominal hernia, diaphragmatic hernia and diverticular intestine.
conclusionWe identified multiple RHGS-associated loci enriched in skeletal muscle. Genetically high RHGS inversely correlated with risks of abdominal hernia, diaphragmatic hernia and diverticular intestine. RHGS polygenic risk score enables risk stratification, and its effects are modulated by diet and common comorbidities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.