Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41593467›Full record

ReviewCritical care (London, England)2026

Better teaching in the intensive care unit: navigating a complex, multi-disciplinary learning environment.

Marie Guinat, Jean-Louis Vincent

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Critical care (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Marie GuinatDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Rue de Bugnon 21, Lausanne, 1011, Switzerland. Marie.Guinat@chuv.ch.
Jean-Louis VincentDepartment of Intensive Care, Erasme University Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, route de Lennik 808, Brussels, 1070, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe intensive care unit (ICU) is a demanding, high‑pressure environment that requires specially trained staff, yet newly trained healthcare professionals often feel inadequately prepared to manage the urgent and complex situations often encountered. The unique nature of the ICU and the diverse backgrounds and experiences of the ICU team create both challenges and opportunities for teaching and learning. Many strategies have been proposed to enhance teaching in the ICU but are often underused. In this perspective, we highlight five approaches that may be used to improve ICU education. TEACHING STRATEGIES: (1) Use the Dunning-Kruger diagram to assess the gap between perceived competence and actual learner performance so that teaching can be targeted appropriately according to each individual’s place on the curve. (2) Use various training methods to limit cognitive overload, such as using short, focused teaching encounters or a flipped classroom model. (3) Use experiential learning to take learners out of their comfort zone, being careful not to push them into the panic zone. (4) Use a safe and inclusive learning environment that encourages all team members to contribute actively. (5) Use a competency-based approach to teaching rather than a time-based approach, recognizing differences in individual progress through task performance and providing a more personalized teaching program.

conclusionQuality teaching is crucial to ensure that ICU professionals are well prepared to deliver safe, evidence-based patient care in the demanding ICU setting. Using some of the approaches outlined herein to integrate cognitive and technical aspects of patient management in a learner-centered manner will facilitate effective teaching in this complex learning environment.

Indexed as

LearningTeachingClinical CompetenceHumansIntensive Care UnitsPatient Care TeamProblem-Based LearningClinical competenceExperiential learningInclusive learningReasoningTeam-based education

Identifiers

PMID41593467
PMCPMC12849421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.