ArticleHuman resources for health2026
The impact of comprehensive training on safe cesarean delivery on non-physician surgeons' knowledge in Tigray, Ethiopia: a pre- and post-test embedded mixed-methods study.
Article in Human resources for health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn Ethiopia, non-physician surgeons, such as Integrated Emergency Surgical Officers (IESOs) and MSc Clinical Midwives, provide critical comprehensive emergency obstetric and surgical care in areas, where physician shortages persist. Although task shifting has improved access to maternal healthcare services in many low-resource settings, maternal and newborn mortality remain high, particularly in the conflict-affected Tigray region. This study aimed to assess the impact of a comprehensive training program on safe cesarean delivery, essential newborn care, and obstetric anesthesia on IESOs' knowledge.
methodsAn embedded mixed-methods design was employed. Quantitative data included a pre-post-test on safe cesarean delivery, early neonatal care, and obstetric anesthesia, as well as a before-and-after training assessment of seven core domains (historical background of cesarean delivery, indications for and safe prevention of cesarean delivery, preoperative preparation, surgical technique, difficult cesarean delivery, early neonatal care, and obstetric anesthesia). Fifty-nine IESOs in Tigray were enrolled. Qualitative data were obtained from two focus group discussions and five in-depth interviews that explored training adequacy and professional competency. Quantitative data were analyzed using R (version 4.6.2), and qualitative data were thematically analyzed using ATLAS.ti (version 7).
resultsA total of 59 participants took part in the quantitative component, 94.9% of whom were male. The mean pre-training knowledge test score on safe cesarean delivery, early neonatal care, and obstetric anesthesia was 60.1 (± 8.7). This increased to 75.7 (± 10.58) on post-training test (mean difference 15.6, 95% CI 13.31-17.9, p < 0.001). The self-reported understanding of the seven domains improved from 17.1 (± 4.2) to 21.5 (± 4.3) (p < 0.001). Qualitative findings confirmed high appreciation of the training's relevance and possible practical application but also highlighted concerns about long-term support, career and skills advancement, and resource constraints in the post-conflict environment.
conclusionsComprehensive and context-specific training significantly enhanced the knowledge of non-physician surgeons in safe cesarean delivery, early neonatal care, and obstetric anestehsia in Tigray. Ongoing mentorship, career development opportunities, and system-level support are crucial for sustaining these gains and rebuilding maternal and newborn health services in conflict-affected and other resource-limited settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.