Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41593425›Full record

ArticleInsights into imaging2026

Imaging persistent spinal pain syndrome and spine surgery complications: an interpretation guide for radiologists.

Jean-François Budzik, Tatiana Musset, Guillaume Lefebvre, Julie Legrand, Julien Decaudain, Vincent Ducoulombier, Sébastien Verclytte

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insights into imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jean-François BudzikService d'imagerie diagnostique et interventionnelle, Groupement Hospitalier de Brocéliande Atlantique, Centre Hospitalier Bretagne Atlantique, Vannes, France. jeanfrancois.budzik@ghba.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6009-5705
Tatiana MussetService d'imagerie diagnostique et interventionnelle, Groupement des Hôpitaux de l'Institut Catholique de Lille, Hôpital Saint Philibert, Lomme, France.
Guillaume LefebvreService d'imagerie diagnostique et interventionnelle, Groupement des Hôpitaux de l'Institut Catholique de Lille, Hôpital Saint Philibert, Lomme, France.
Julie LegrandService d'imagerie diagnostique et interventionnelle, Groupement des Hôpitaux de l'Institut Catholique de Lille, Hôpital Saint Philibert, Lomme, France.
Julien DecaudainService de chirurgie orthopédique et rachidienne, Groupement des Hôpitaux de l'Institut Catholique de Lille, Hôpital Saint Philibert, Lomme, France.
Vincent DucoulombierService de rhumatologie. Groupement des Hôpitaux de l'Institut Catholique de Lille, Hôpital Saint Vincent de Paul, Lille, France.
Sébastien VerclytteService d'imagerie diagnostique et interventionnelle, Groupement des Hôpitaux de l'Institut Catholique de Lille, Hôpital Saint Philibert, Lomme, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This educational review provides a comprehensive guide for radiologists on the imaging interpretation of persistent spinal pain syndrome (PSPS) and complications following spine surgery. PSPS, previously known as failed back surgery syndrome, describes persistent or recurrent, primarily neuropathic, pain after spine surgery affecting 10-40% of patients. Radiologists often encounter challenges in diagnosing PSPS due to unfamiliarity with postoperative anatomical modifications and the complexity of surgical interventions. This review emphasises the necessity of correlating imaging findings with the clinical context through an interdisciplinary collaboration, while keeping in mind the particular psychological context of postoperative patients in chronic pain. We focus on lumbar spine surgery such as lumbar spine discectomy, lumbar spine stenosis, posterior decompression and stabilisation-fusion procedures. The review offers practical insights into managing key clinical scenarios: early complications with genuine emergencies, but also more subtle diagnoses such as low-grade infections or hardware failures. We underscore the utility of various imaging modalities-radiography, CT, MRI, PET and SPECT, and propose the ideal combination for each clinical situation. Plain radiographs are useful for assessing patients in standing positions and detecting intervertebral instability. CT is ideal for examining bone fusion and surgical hardware, while MRI excels in soft tissue analysis. PET and SPECT provide crucial insights into bone metabolism, detecting micromobility or infections. Based on 15 years of interdisciplinary collaboration, this guide, based on clinical scenarios, aims to enhance radiologists' confidence and accuracy in interpreting postoperative spine imaging, improving diagnostic precision, patient management and communication with referring clinicians. KEY POINTS: Managing postoperative spine imaging is often challenging for surgeons and radiologists. Postoperative spine imaging requires precise clinical correlation and careful multidisciplinary evaluation. Different imaging modalities can be combined to answer difficult issues.

Indexed as

Failed back surgery syndromeImagingPostoperative painSpine

Identifiers

PMID41593425
PMCPMC12847616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.