ArticleInsights into imaging2026
Imaging persistent spinal pain syndrome and spine surgery complications: an interpretation guide for radiologists.
Article in Insights into imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This educational review provides a comprehensive guide for radiologists on the imaging interpretation of persistent spinal pain syndrome (PSPS) and complications following spine surgery. PSPS, previously known as failed back surgery syndrome, describes persistent or recurrent, primarily neuropathic, pain after spine surgery affecting 10-40% of patients. Radiologists often encounter challenges in diagnosing PSPS due to unfamiliarity with postoperative anatomical modifications and the complexity of surgical interventions. This review emphasises the necessity of correlating imaging findings with the clinical context through an interdisciplinary collaboration, while keeping in mind the particular psychological context of postoperative patients in chronic pain. We focus on lumbar spine surgery such as lumbar spine discectomy, lumbar spine stenosis, posterior decompression and stabilisation-fusion procedures. The review offers practical insights into managing key clinical scenarios: early complications with genuine emergencies, but also more subtle diagnoses such as low-grade infections or hardware failures. We underscore the utility of various imaging modalities-radiography, CT, MRI, PET and SPECT, and propose the ideal combination for each clinical situation. Plain radiographs are useful for assessing patients in standing positions and detecting intervertebral instability. CT is ideal for examining bone fusion and surgical hardware, while MRI excels in soft tissue analysis. PET and SPECT provide crucial insights into bone metabolism, detecting micromobility or infections. Based on 15 years of interdisciplinary collaboration, this guide, based on clinical scenarios, aims to enhance radiologists' confidence and accuracy in interpreting postoperative spine imaging, improving diagnostic precision, patient management and communication with referring clinicians. KEY POINTS: Managing postoperative spine imaging is often challenging for surgeons and radiologists. Postoperative spine imaging requires precise clinical correlation and careful multidisciplinary evaluation. Different imaging modalities can be combined to answer difficult issues.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.