ArticleEvidence-based dentistry2026
Can lasers help reduce post-root-canal pain more than ultrasonics?
Article in Evidence-based dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
a commentary onSabeti M, Harouni A, Gabbay J. Comparing Ultrasonically Activated Irrigation and Laser-Activated Irrigation for Postoperative Pain Reduction in Endodontics: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Journal of Endodontics 2025
objectiveA recent systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated whether laser-activated irrigation offers a measurable benefit over ultrasonic activation in reducing postoperative endodontic pain. Seven randomized controlled trials involving 490 teeth were included. Across multiple time points (6 h to 7 days), LAI demonstrated a consistently greater reduction in patient-reported pain than UAI, with the effect most pronounced at 24-48 h post-treatment. Pulsed Er:YAG laser modalities-particularly PIPS and SWEEPS-showed the highest analgesic effect, while diode lasers showed little to no added benefit. Despite moderate to high heterogeneity and some concerns regarding allocation concealment in several trials, the overall certainty of evidence was rated low-to-moderate. The findings suggest that LAI, especially advanced Er:YAG-based protocols, may provide short-term pain. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: While LAI-particularly Er:YAG systems-may enhance short-term patient comfort, UAI remains an effective and pragmatic standard in typical dental practice.
designSystematic review and meta-analysis (PRISMA-compliant), prospectively registered on PROSPERO. CASE SELECTION: Adult patients undergoing primary non-surgical root canal treatment for irreversible pulpitis, necrotic pulp, or apical periodontitis. Only RCTs comparing LAI vs UAI with postoperative VAS pain measurements were included. DATA ANALYSIS: Random-effects modeling, subgroup analyses by laser type and timepoint, sensitivity analyses excluding imputed data, and GRADE certainty assessment.
resultsLAI demonstrated superior postoperative pain reduction compared to UAI. Er:YAG-based systems (PIPS, SWEEPS) showed the strongest effects. Diode lasers showed minimal benefit. Heterogeneity remained high.
conclusionsLAI provides measurable short-term postoperative pain benefits but should not be recommended as a replacement for UAI in routine practice due to cost and accessibility challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41593409What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.