ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2026
Multidisciplinary team interpretation performance for indeterminate bone uptake on PSMA PET during prostate cancer staging: Comparison with PROMISE criteria.
Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparative analysis of PSMA-RADS Version 2.0 versus bone uptake metastatic probability (BUMP) score for characterising focal bone uptake on [18F]PSMA-1007 PET/CT in prostate cancer - a multicentre evaluation.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo compare the performance of a multidisciplinary team (MDT) with the proposed standardized PROMISE classification system for indeterminate bone uptake on staging PSMA PET.
methods744 staging PSMA PET/CT scans (140
resultsThe overall incidence of indeterminate bone uptake in staging PSMA PET scans was 16.9%, reaching 40% for
conclusionPROMISE may interpret indeterminate bone PSMA uptake with high accuracy. Therefore, PET reporters are recommended to use the PROMISE algorithm, while being mindful of common pitfalls related to the Gleason score, tracer used and anatomical localisation of indeterminate bone findings. Additional discussion in an MDT meeting is recommended with a view to resolve all equivocal findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41593361What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.