Observational studyJournal of neurology2026
Real-time detection and subtyping of "On-meds" freezing of gait in Parkinson's disease using lower-limb acceleration data.
Observational study in Journal of neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAlthough many patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) report experiencing episodes of freezing of gait (FOG) at home under ON medication ("On-meds") conditions, objective and accurate diagnosis of different types of FOG events remains an extremely challenging task.
methodsWe conducted an observational, case-control study enrolling 75 consecutive PD patients, who were classified into "freezer" (n = 50) and "non-freezer" (n = 25) group, based on responses to the FOG Questionnaire and clinical confirmation. A modified timed up and go (TUG) protocol comprised one single‑task TUG (sTUG) and two dual‑task TUGs (cognitive, manual). Synchronized video and a single wearable sensor (Ambulosono) provided parallel capture for real‑time detection and subtyping of FOG.
resultsIn the "freezers" group, 337 FOG episodes occurred during TUG testing, whereas none were recorded in the "non‑freezers" group (p < 0.01). The mean frequency was 2.25 FOG episodes per person per test. Compared with the sTUG test (74 FOG episodes), dual-task trials identified 263 FOG episodes, representing a 255% increase (p < 0.01). Trembling, shuffling and akinetic subtypes were identifiable on the device display (GMGI), with sensitivity 87.2% and specificity 89.5% versus video. Wearable data also localized subtypes by gait phase (initiation, turning, midway and ending).
conclusions"On-meds" FOGs can be objectively diagnosed among self-reported freezers using a dual task protocol during gait tests. Parallel video and wearable sensor recordings facilitate the real-time detection and subtyping of "On-meds" FOGs, which can substantially improve the current clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41593357What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.