ArticleScientific reports2026
Florescence based analytical assessment of plasma neopterin and its clinical relevance in hypertension.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neopterin (NPN), a pteridine derivative produced by activated monocytes and macrophages in response to interferon-γ, is a recognized biomarker of cellular immune activation, with elevated plasma levels reported in infections, autoimmune diseases, cardiovascular disorders, and cancers. There is an increasing attention given to its role in oxidative stress and vascular dysfunction in hypertension. In this work, a fluorescence-based method was developed and validated for the determination of NPN in plasma using derivatization with 4-fluoro-7-nitro-2,1,3-benzoxadiazole (NBD-F). The reaction produced a stable fluorescent conjugate with a quantum yield of 0.61 compared to 0.21 for native NPN, resulting in enhanced signal intensity and improved selectivity. The method showed linearity over the concentration range of 1–20 ng/mL with a correlation coefficient of 0.9997. The limits of detection and quantification were 0.15 ng/mL and 0.45 ng/mL, respectively, with a mean recovery of 98.54%. Intra-day and inter-day relative standard deviations were below 2.5%, and interference from structurally related compounds was negligible (< 4%). The validated method was applied in a clinical case–control study of 52 participants (26 hypertensive patients and 26 normotensive controls), revealing significantly higher plasma NPN levels in hypertensive patients (3.0 ± 0.7 ng/mL) compared to controls (1.8 ± 0.4 ng/mL, p = 0.0002), with positive correlations to systolic (r = 0.48, p = 0.009) and diastolic blood pressure (r = 0.42, p = 0.025). These findings demonstrate that the developed method provides a sensitive and reliable approach for plasma NPN quantification and support its potential as a biomarker of hypertension diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.