Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41593298›Full record

ReviewCurrent reviews in musculoskeletal medicine2026

The Remplissage Procedure in Addition to Arthroscopic Stabilization for Non-Engaging Hill Sachs Lesions: A Systematic Review.

Harjind Singh Kahlon, Helena Son, Prushoth Vivekanantha, Marc Daniel Bouchard, Jeffrey Kay

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Harjind Singh KahlonTemerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Helena SonMichael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Prushoth VivekananthaDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. prushoth.vivekanantha@medportal.ca.
Marc Daniel BouchardDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Jeffrey KayDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewTo evaluate the clinical outcomes of patients with on-track or non-engaging Hill-Sachs lesions (HSLs) undergoing Bankart repair (BR) versus BR with adjunctive remplissage (BR-R). RECENT

findingsThree databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PubMed) were searched on August 4th, 2025 for studies assessing outcomes following BR and BR-R. Nine studies involving 1006 patients (20.2% female, mean age 24.4 years, mean follow-up 33.5 months, 682 BR, 324 BR-R) were included. Compared with BR-R, the BR group demonstrated higher rates of recurrent instability (16.1% vs. 3.7%; RR = 3.39, 95% CI 1.96-5.89, p < 0.001, I

Indexed as

Bankart repair (BR)Hill-Sachs lesion (HSL)On-track, non-engagingRemplissage

Identifiers

PMID41593298
PMCPMC12847469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.