ArticleScientific reports2026
Network based analysis of student self governance networks and predictive role in civic participation outcomes.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study examines the relationship between student Self-Governance Networks (SGN) and Civic Participation Outcomes (CPO) using a network-based analytical framework. Data were collected from 237 student governance participants at a regional university in eastern China and analyzed using Social Network Analysis (SNA), Multivariate Regression (MR), and Machine Learning (ML) classification. The SGN displayed a modular network comprising 6 functional communities, including central administration, academic councils, disciplinary bodies, and interest-based organizations. Structural analysis revealed a hierarchical hub-and-spoke configuration, with the central student government serving as the primary bridge across communities, while peripheral groups remained comparatively isolated. Centrality measures varied systematically across roles, with formal leadership positions occupying structurally advantaged positions. Regression analyses controlling for demographics confirmed that network position significantly predicted civic engagement, with eigenvector centrality and the Community E-I Index emerging as consistent predictors across results. ML models, particularly XGBoost, achieved strong predictive accuracy (accuracy = 0.781, AUC-ROC = 0.842), indicating that network features reliably differentiate engaged from non-engaged students. These findings indicate that the civic benefits of governance participation are not uniformly distributed but depend on an individual's structural position, with ties to central actors and cross-community linkages enhancing involvement. The study outlines theoretical contributions and practical implications for governance design and civic education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.