ArticleScientific reports2026
Intelligent multi-objective optimization of thermal comfort and ventilation performance in stratum ventilation design.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Stratum ventilation (SV) has emerged as a promising approach for simultaneously addressing indoor thermal comfort, airflow effectiveness, and energy efficiency. Yet, most prior research considers predictive modeling, optimization, and decision-support separately, which reduces their usefulness in practice. To overcome this gap, the present study develops an integrated hybrid framework that links machine learning models, metaheuristic optimization, and multi-criteria decision-making into a unified workflow for SV enhancement. The proposed methodology unfolds in four sequential phases: (1) data preparation and statistical assessment, (2) development of predictive models using artificial neural networks (ANN) optimized through genetic algorithm (GA) and leader Harris Hawks optimization (LHHO), (3) multi-objective optimization employing NSGA-III, and (4) ranking of Pareto-optimal solutions with the VIKOR method to accommodate different operational priorities. The findings indicate that GA-assisted ANN consistently achieved superior prediction accuracy (R > 0.995) compared to LHHO-ANN. Optimal thermal comfort was obtained with supply air velocities of 1.18-1.20 m/s, supply air temperatures around 22.0-22.2 °C, and clothing insulation levels near 1.0 clo. Ventilation performance benefited from small vane angles (≤ 5°) and cooler wall surface temperatures (≤ 12 °C), while stratification was mitigated under wider vane angles (> 10°) combined with moderately higher wall surface temperatures (13-14 °C). Heating efficiency proved robust across all candidate solutions, with a consistent utilization coefficient of approximately 1.58. The VIKOR-based ranking organized the Pareto front into ten representative design scenarios, each offering a balanced trade-off among comfort, air quality, and energy use under varying preference weights. By structuring prediction, optimization, and decision-making in a single framework, this study delivers actionable strategies for tailoring SV operation in diverse settings such as office buildings emphasizing comfort, healthcare spaces requiring ventilation effectiveness, and large halls where stratification control is critical.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.